SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 81898

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR.MATHEW JOHN – Appellant
Versus
SRI.DR.RAJAN N KHOBRAGADE – Respondent
Con.Case(C) 1308/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1308 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.04.2024 IN WP(C) NO.10160 OF

2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS/PETITIONER:

DR.MATHEW JOHN AGED 60 YEARS S/O N.P.JOHN, NEDIYAPALAKKAL, PALLICHAKKALA ROAD, SOUTH EROOR P.O., TRIPUNITHURA-682 306 PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF METERIA MEDICA, DR.PADIAR MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, CHOTTANIKKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683312 BY ADV SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION:

1 SRI.DR.RAJAN N KHOBRAGADE AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, AYUSH (B) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001

2 SRI.DR.RAVEENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FINANCE (PRC-C) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001

3 SMT.DR.SHEELA AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL AND CONTROLLING OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001

4 SRI.DR.M.G.RADHESH AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL, DR.PADIAR MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, CHOTTANIKKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683312 BY ADV BY ADV R.RANJANIE ADV NISHA BOSE - SR GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter came up for consideration the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, the undisputed amount of Rs.8,44,560/- (Rupees eight lakhs forty four thousand five hundred and sixty only) has been disbursed. Thus, the interim order has been complied with. In such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed recording the above submission.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JUDGE scs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top