Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DR.ANJALI SIVADAS SHANTHI NIKETHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed to quash the complaint under the kerala shops and commercial establishments act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court discussions emphasize the misapplication of the statute's definition on commercial establishments. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. based on previous judgments, the court holds that the petitioner’s premises are exempt from the act. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. prosecution was found to be an abuse of process and thus quashed. (Para 9) |
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
-------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.404 of 2014 ----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 04th day of September, 2024
ORDER
This criminal miscellaneous case is filed to quash Annexure-A1 complaint pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ottapalam, as S.T.No.1513/2013. Petitioner is a Homeo Doctor practicing on her own is the submission. The 2nd respondent instituted Annexure-A1 complaint against the petitioner before the Judicial First Class Magistrates Court, Ottapalam, alleging offences punishable under Section 2 9 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act , 1960 (for short, Act 1960) and Rule 14 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Rules, 1961 (for sh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
