SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 85292

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
UMMAR – Appellant
Versus
VAKAYIL KOYAS DAUGHTER FATHIMATH SUHARA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN &

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 19TH BHADRA, 1946 MAT.APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.09.2018 IN OP NO.66 OF 2015 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT:

UMMAR, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. KOLANGARAKATH MOIDHEEN HAJI, TIRUR AMSOM, PORUR DESOM, POOKAYIL BAZAR P.O., TIRUR TALUK-676 107, TIRUR POLICE STATION LIMIT.

BY ADV ESM.KABEER RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:

1 VAKAYIL KOYA’S DAUGHTER FATHIMATH SUHARA, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O. KOLANGARAKATH JAMSHEER, VETTAM PALLIPRAM AMSOM DESOM, CHAMRAVATTAM P.O., TIRUR TALUK-676 102, TIRUR POLICE STATION LIMIT.

2 JAMSHEER, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.KOLANGARAKATH UMMAR, TIRUR AMSOM, PORUR DESOM, POOKAYIL BAZAR P.O., TIRUR TALUK-676 107, TIRUR POLICE STATION LIMIT.

BY ADV SRI.M.DEVESH THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

It is now stated that the appellant is no more and that his legal heirs have not come on record.

Obviously, this Appeal has abated, and it is therefore, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top