SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 86914

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BHASKARAN. P. V – Appellant
Versus
MS. RANI GEORGE I A S – Respondent
Con.Case(C) 1784/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 12TH ASWINA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1784 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.14813 OF

2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS:

1 BHASKARAN. P.V, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, RETD.PRINCIPAL, PARUDUR HIGH SCHOOL (AIDED), PATTAMBI,PALAKKAD RESIDING AT ‘CHITHRANJALI’, PALLIPPURAM, KARAMBATHUR (PO), PALAKKAD, PIN – 679 305. 2 MUHAMMED ASHARAF.V, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.MUSA P, PRINCIPAL, P.T.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,TRIKKATIRI VATTRA ESTATE, TRIKKATIRI , PALAKKAD RESIDING AT VATTARA, TRIKKATIRI, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679502

3 SATHI.V, AGED 63 YEARS, W/O.T.K.MADHAVAN, RETD. PRINCIPAL, S.S.O. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, LAKKIDI, RESIDING AT ‘SAAKETHAM’, LAKKIDI, PALAKKAD, PIN – 679 301.

4 USHA DEVI.K, AGED 64 YEARS, W/O.ACHUTHAN A, RETD. PRINCIPAL, V.I.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALLASSANA, PALAKKAD-678 501 RESIDING AT ‘NINAVUU’, NOCHUR, KODUVAYUR, PALAKKAD, PIN – 678 501. BY ADV.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS:

1 MS.RANI GEORGE I A S, AGE & FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT (ANNEX), THIRUVANANTHYAPURAM PIN – 695 001.

2 MR.S. SHANAVAS I A S, AGE & FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 014.

3 MR.P.M.ANIL, AGE & FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MALAPPURAM, PIN – 676 505.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter came up for consideration, both sides submitted that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with. Therefore, this contempt of court case is closed.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE DG/4.10.24 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1784/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A 1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED

11.04.2017 IN W.P.(C) NO. 14813/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT Annexure A 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED

09.01.2020 IN W.A. NO. 1689/2017 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT Annexure A 3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED

30.04.2024 IN S.L.P(C)NO. 18120/2019 ALONG WITH CONNECTED CASES Annexure A 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED

06.05.2024 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER TO ALL RESPONDENTS Annexure A 5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SEND BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS DATED

10.06.2024 Annexure A 6 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER [ RT ]NO. 2913/2021/G.EDN DATED 02.06.2021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top