SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 87142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOSEPH MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 26444/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 15TH ASWINA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 26444 OF 2024 PETITIONER:

JOSEPH MATHEW AGED 70 YEARS OUSEPARAMBIL ULLANAD P.O., PIN – 686651.

BY ADVS.

V.GANGADHARAN JOSHI N.THOMAS RESPONDENTS:

1 KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD 'BHADRATHA' MUSEIUM ROAD P.B NO. 510 TRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR., PIN – 680020.

2 THE CHAIRMAN KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD.

'BHADRATHA' MUSEUM ROAD, PB NO;

510 TRISSUR, PIN – 680020.

3 THE BRANCH MANAGER KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., 2ND FLOOR, ST.THOMAS MALL, OPPOSITE TO HEAD POST OFFICE, PALA, PIN – 686575.

BY ADVS.

P.PRIJITH SRI SALIL NARAYANAN K, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 7th day of October, 2024 The petitioner, who is a subscriber to Chitty conducted by the 1st respondent-Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash Ext.P4 and to command respondents 2 and 3 to dispose of Ext.P5 petition of the petitioner expeditiously. The petitioner has also sought to direct the respondents to disburse net chit amount to the petitioner as per his entitlement determined as per 'draw' for Chittal No.3 and 7 respectively in Chitty No.19/2019/A-1.

2. Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioner has taken three Chitties and Ext.P4 notice issued is only in respect of one Chitty. However, as the petitioner has made Ext.P5 representation, the same can be considered by the 1st respondent's Managing Director.

3. The petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied for the time being, if Ext.P5 is considered by the Managing Director of the 1st respondent.

In the afore facts, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Managing Director of the 1st respondent to consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in Ext.P5 and take appropriate decision thereon within a period of one month, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE ams APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26444/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF CHITTY PERSONAL LEDGER IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER AS CHITTAL NO.3 IN CHITTY NO.19/2019/A/1 DATED

07.03.2024 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF CHITTY PERSONAL LEDGER IN RESPECT OF CHITTAL NO.7 IN CHITTY NO.

19/2019/A-I DATED 07.03.2024 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF CHITTY PERSONAL LEDGER IN RECEIPT OF CHITTAL NO.17 IN CHITTY NO.19/2019/A1 DATED 07.03 2024 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 29.04.2024 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ADDRESSED.

TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 03.06.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top