Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Not specified, Not specified
1st and 2nd accused – Appellant
Versus
2nd respondent/defacto complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case involving allegations against kseb officials. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the legitimacy of the fir. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the sustainability of the fir based on evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards for quashing firs based on mala fide intentions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion that the fir is quashed due to lack of bona fides in the allegations. (Para 13) |
ORDER
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (` BNSS ’ for short), seeking quashment of all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure F FIR arising out of Crime No.359/2024 of Thiruvambady Police Station, Kozhikode Rural. The petitioners are the 1st and 2nd accused in the above crime.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant. Perused the relevant documents.
3. Precisely spelt, the prosecution case is that at about 13.30 hours on 04.07.2024 when the accused herein, who are officials of the Kerala State Electricity Board (`KSEB’ for short), reac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
