SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 88359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JAYAPRASAD B. (DIED) LHRS IMPLEADED – Appellant
Versus
VAISALINI (DIED) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES IMPLEADED – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.356/2009 is the appellant. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition of plaint A Schedule Property into five equal shares and for allotment of 1/5 share to the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, the plaint A schedule property belonged to his father Ramdas and on the death of Ramdas in the year 1990, the plaint schedule property devolved upon the first defendant wife and the plaintiff & defendants 2 to 4 who are his children. The plaint schedule property is 3.02 Acres of land comprised in Re.Sy. No.258/3 of Paddy Village in Kasaragod Taluk.

2. In the Written Statement filed by the 1st defendant, the 1st defendant contended that she sold the Plaint A schedule property. Thereupon the plaintiff impleaded the defendants 5 to 9 in the suit. The 5th defendant is the buyer of the Plaint A Schedule Property in Ext.B7 Sale Deed dated 19/07/1993 executed by the 1st defendant for herself, for the plaintiff and the defendants 2 & 3 as their Power of Attorney holder and for the 4th defendant as her guardian on account of her minority. The defendants 6 to 9 are the assignees from the 5th defendant as per Exts.B1,B2,B3 & B6. The plaintiff amended the pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top