IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JAYAPRASAD B. (DIED) LHRS IMPLEADED – Appellant
Versus
VAISALINI (DIED) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES IMPLEADED – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.356/2009 is the appellant. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition of plaint A Schedule Property into five equal shares and for allotment of 1/5 share to the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, the plaint A schedule property belonged to his father Ramdas and on the death of Ramdas in the year 1990, the plaint schedule property devolved upon the first defendant wife and the plaintiff & defendants 2 to 4 who are his children. The plaint schedule property is 3.02 Acres of land comprised in Re.Sy. No.258/3 of Paddy Village in Kasaragod Taluk.
2. In the Written Statement filed by the 1st defendant, the 1st defendant contended that she sold the Plaint A schedule property. Thereupon the plaintiff impleaded the defendants 5 to 9 in the suit. The 5th defendant is the buyer of the Plaint A Schedule Property in Ext.B7 Sale Deed dated 19/07/1993 executed by the 1st defendant for herself, for the plaintiff and the defendants 2 & 3 as their Power of Attorney holder and for the 4th defendant as her guardian on account of her minority. The defendants 6 to 9 are the assignees from the 5th defendant as per Exts.B1,B2,B3 & B6. The plaintiff amended the pl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.