JUDGMENT :

(A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.)

The petitioner in W.P.(C).No.242 of 2021 is the appellant before us, aggrieved by the judgment dated 14.03.2025 of a learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition.

2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the Writ Appeal are as follows:

The appellant had approached the writ court challenging Ext.P2 order dated 05.10.2016 issued by the 2^nd respondent District Collector, Kannur accrediting the 6^th respondent as an agency for conducting Social Impact Assessment and submitting time bound reports. He had also impugned Ext.P7 notification dated 28.09.2020 issued by the 2^nd respondent District Collector, Kannur appointing the 7^th respondent as the Social Impact Assessment Unit as also Ext.P8 report dated 19.10.2020 of the 7^th respondent and Ext.P9 report dated 06.11.2020 prepared by the Expert Committee constituted by the District Collector, Kannur. There was also a separate challenge to Ext.P13 order dated 11.11.2020 issued by the 2^nd respondent, Ext.P11 preliminary notification dated 19.11.2020 issued by the 2^nd respondent as well as a prayer for declaration that Rule 18 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition