Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RASHEED P – Appellant
Versus
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for the removal of a lien on the bank account. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. clarification by the bank regarding the status of the account. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 03rd day of December, 2024 The writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to remove lien over the petitioner's bank account bearing No.50100173314159.
2. The petitioner’s case is that, the 2nd respondent bank has frozen the petitioner's current bank account without any reason. The action of the 2nd respondent is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned counsel appearing for the
2nd respondent bank.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submitted that the petitioner's bank account has not been frozen. It is only because the petitioner has not furnished the KYC forms to the 2nd respondent, that the bank account has become in-operative. As soon the petitioner provides the KYC details, the bank account will be made operative. The said submission is recorded. Therefore, it will be upto the petitioner to provide his KYC details to the 2nd respondent bank. If the said KYC details are furnished, the 2nd respondent sh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
