SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, Murali Purushothaman, J
SUO MOTU PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23076 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SUO MOTU
For the Respondents: MANU S. DSG OF INDIA, K.L.NARASIMHAN, GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.), K.S.SANTHI, ALEXY AUGUSTINE, LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN, GEORGE A.CHERIAN, SRI. K.P. HARISH, SR. GP

The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 establishes a comprehensive framework for cashless emergency treatment of road accident victims through insurance companies, thus addressing public concerns about immediate medical costs.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 146, 165, 166, 161, 162, and 164B - Suo motu petition concerning the responsibility of insurance companies for immediate treatment costs of accident victims; provisions for cashless treatment during the golden hour have been established. The court acknowledged recommendations for operational procedures but noted existing legal frameworks that addressed the concerns raised. (Paras 1.1-1.11)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - The necessity for immediate emergency treatment for accident victims and the role of insurance companies. The court found that the relief sought by petitioners is already covered under the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 provisions for cashless treatment and the establishment of a Motor Vehicle Accident Fund. (Paras 2-12)

Facts of the case:
Students petitioned the court due to financial burdens faced by families of accident victims, highlighting an instance involving a classmate who incurred heavy medical expenses. They requested insurance companies to cover treatment costs immediately post-accident. (Paras 1.1-1.5)

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that existing legal provisions under the Motor Vehicles Act sufficiently cover the concerns about emergency treatment costs for road accident victims. (Paragraphs 1.8-1.11)

Issues: Whether existing laws adequately address the treatment costs of accident victims and the necessity for immediate insurance intervention. (Paras 3-10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the sufficiency of the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 in addressing the grievances of the petitioners, reiterating the establishment of a framework for quick medical response and funding mechanisms. (Paras 4-12)

Result: Writ petition closed as the concerns are adequately addressed by existing legal provisions.

Table of Content
1. immediate treatment costs for accident victims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. need for insurance coverage for treatment. (Para 3)
3. provisions under motor vehicles act regarding insurance (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
4. application of motor vehicle accident fund. (Para 8)
5. closure of the writ petition. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 12th day of April, 2023

S.Manikumar, C.J.

Instant suo motu writ petition has been registered on the following facts:

1.1. On 10.02.2021, a petition was submitted by the students of Mariyan International Management Studies, Kuttikanam, Idukki addressed to the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas regarding the bearing of immediate/specialist treatment costs of accident victims by the Insurance company/Insurance Regulatory Authority.

1.2. They cited the case of their classmate, Kum. Shani Babu, who met with an accident on 13.01.2021 when she returned home from her college. Even though, she was admitted in the Government Medical College, as specialist facilities like scanning is not available in the hospital, nearly one lakh rupees was spent for her treatment and for facilities availed from the nearby private hospitals. They stated that this is a very pathetic situation that parents who are working as coolie and with no sound financial condition wander for money for the treatment of their daughter, amidst the Covid- 19 pandemic. They requested a timely intervention from the Court in this matter. Even though they collected and contributed to her treatment, it did not sufÏce and thus, they came to know about the difÏculties faced by the motor vehicle accident victims, the sufferings that their family has to endure and requested the Court to direct the Insurance Company/Insurance Regulatory Authority to bear the cost of immediate treatment of accident victims.

1.3. The petitioners suggested to bring all the Government and other hospitals in this Country under one roof for carrying out emergency treatments for the accident victims and suggests that in the event of an accident, the treatment costs must be borne by the insurance companies, which later can be deducted from the insurance claim.

1.4. They pointed out the instance of death of a person that happened in this state and the ensuing declaration of a Government proposal of an insurance policy which stated to take care of the emergency treatment of accident cases for the first 48 hours, the conditions of the proposal was opposed by the insurance companies and the proposal was axed.

1.5. They also pointed out the order of the Kerala State Human Rights Commission that the State Government should bear the cost of the treatment of the accident victims. For this, it was proposed to raise a reserve fund by earmarking 10% of the amount collected as fine for petty offences by the Police and Motor Vehicle Department. The State Government was directed to submit an action taken report in this regard before 30/08/2013, but the accidents show that this has not been given due consideration by the State Government.

1.6. They requested that a direction should be given to the Insurance Companies to incur the expenses for the immediate treatment of accident victims.

2. General Insurance Council represented by Secretary General, Mumbai, respondent No.6, has filed a counter afÏdavit dated 31.03.2023.

3. Relevant portion of the counter afÏdavit is reproduced:

“3. This writ petition is intended to Consider different methods by which the miseries of the motor accident victims can be reduced. The main grievance projected in this petition is the necessity to provide cashless emergency treatment to victims of motor accidents. It is also prayed that all Government and other Hospitals in this country are to be brought under one roof for carrying out emergency treatment for accident victims and suggest that in the event of an accident the treatment cost be borne by the insurance companies which later can be deducted from the Insurance claim. It is for a direction to the Government that emergen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top