HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
MUHAMMED SHAFI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 4296/2023
NDPS Act - Bail Application - Sections 22(c), 29
Fact of the Case:
The accused was arrested on 27.12.2022 for allegedly possessing 23 grams of MDMA for the purpose of sale, which he purchased from the second accused. The accused was booked under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Chemical Analysis Report showed that the contraband involved was 'Methamphetamine' and not 'MDMA' as alleged by the prosecution, and the quantity was of an intermediate level. The court had already granted the accused interim bail on 6.10.2023.
Issues: Whether the accused should be granted bail in the case registered under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the fact that the contraband involved was of an intermediate quantity and that the accused had already been granted interim bail, and therefore, the application for bail was to be allowed.
Final Decision: The application for bail is allowed, and the interim order dated 6.10.2023 is made absolute.
The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , by the first accused in Crime No.716/2022 of the Mankada Police Station, Malappuram, registered against the accused, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 22 (c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, ‘NDPS Act’). The petitioner was arrested on 27.12.2022.
2. The essence of the prosecution case is that;
3. Heard Sri. K.Rakesh the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
4. When the application came up for consideration on 21.9.2023, this Court taking into consideration the fact that the contraband involved in the case is 23 grams of MDMA and in view of Rule 14 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling, and Disposal) Rules, 2022 , directed the Investigating Officer to submit the Chemical Analysis Report. However, since the Chemical Analysis Report was not filed as directed by this Court, by order dated 6.10.2023, the petitioner was enlarged on interim bail. The learned Public Prosecutor was directed to produce the Chemical Analysis Report.
5. Today, when the application was taken up for consideration, the learned Public Prosecutor made available the Chemical Analysis Report dated 13.10.2023 submitted by the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Thrissur, which shows that the contraband involved in the case is ‘Methamphetamine’ and not ‘MDMA’ as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, the contraband is of an intermediate quantity.
6. On an anxious consideration of the facts, the rival submissions made across the Bar, and the materials placed on record, particularly considering the fact that the contraband involved in the case of an intermediate quantity, this Court has already enlarged the petitioner on interim bail by order dated 6.10.2023, I am of the view that the application is only to be allowed.
In the result, the application is allowed, by making the interim order dated 6.10.2023 absolute.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.