SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1880

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
V M ABDUL SHUKOOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) 23754/2023



Mandatory safety regulations in building constructions cannot be exempted, and permits issued without proper approvals lack legal validity.

Headnote:

Building - Construction Permits - Kerala Building Rules - Sections 15A, 5 - The court found multiple illegalities in the granting of building permits exempting mandatory provisions under relevant rules, which led to its decision to quash the permits.

Fact of the Case:

Two writ petitions challenged the legality of building permits granted for constructing additional floors on a commercial building in Kochi. The petitioners contended that the permits were obtained illegally and in violation of the Kerala Building Rules, specifically citing lack of necessary approvals and safety concerns.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the applicability of various building regulations and found that the exemption orders were granted without due process, lacked necessary approvals, and violated public safety mandates. The permits were thus deemed arbitrary and legally unsustainable.

Issues: Whether the exemption granted from mandatory provisions of the Kerala Building Rules is lawful, the validity of 2018 committee decisions, the sustainability of recent building permits, and the impact of delay in filing petitions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that mandatory provisions regarding public safety and proper procedure cannot be exempted and that any issuance of permits without the Chief Town Planner's recommendations or compliance with legal frameworks is invalid.

Final Decision: The court set aside the exemption order and building permits due to their illegal issuance.

JUDGEMENT

Construction of buildings is regulated to strike a balance between the built and the non-built environment. Planned constructions are essential to ensure sustainable growth and development of the country. However, human greed and utter disregard for law have led to rampant illegal constructions. Official nexus for such reprehensible activities has acted as a bridge for aiding the violators. Illegalities often turn into fait accompli and escape the clutches of law. Nevertheless, courts cannot turn a blind eye when such instances are brought to its notice.

2. The above prelude indicates the nature of disputes raised in these two writ petitions. Both writ petitions relate to the construction of a building at Broadway – a commercial hotspot in Kochi. The first writ petition challenged the building permits issued for the construction of additional floors to an existing building, while the second writ petition was filed subsequently after additional information was obtained. Since the issues are connected, both writ petitions are disposed of together.

3. Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.5712 of 2023 challenge a building permit dated 25-05-2022 (Ext.P12) issued to respondents 9 to 15 and also the building permit dated 26-07-2004 (Ext.P14). Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.23754 of 2023 challenge an order of exemption issued by the Government on 17-12-2002 (Ext.P11), allegedly granting exemption from various mandatory provisions of the Kerala Building Rules , 1984 (for short KBR ), the decision dated 12-04-2018 (Ext.P14) of the Special Committee constituted under Rule 15A of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999 (for short KMBR 1999) and the consequential building permit dated 25-05-2022 (Ext.P15). The orders are challenged as being issued illegally, on extraneous and irrelevant considerations and that too with malafides.

4. Petitioners are the owners of different shop rooms in a building called “Koluthara Broadway Bazar.” The building is constructed on a total land area of about 51.373 cents in the centre of Kochi city. The original owners of the land were Sebastian Varghese and Grace Antony, who obtained a building permit on 24-11-1998 to construct three floors - the basement, the ground floor, and the first floor.

5. Petitioners had purchased undivided shares in the land along with the right to construct the rooms forming part of the larger three-storied building and thus became co-owners of the property. In the meantime, all the rooms of the shopping complex were constructed and completed in accordance with the building permit and the shop rooms were even assessed to property tax after allotting building numbers. Petitioners allege that though the construction of the outer structure was complete, a portion of the common facilities and amenities offered by the original owners had not been completed. In the meantime, since the original owners had incurred substantial liability with the Federal Bank, petitioners and others pooled money and cleared the liability on the assurance that two more floors would be constructed over the three-storied building as consideration for the payment made by them. Subsequently, the additional second and third floors were constructed. However, it was found that the additional constructions were not in terms of the approved plan since the building did not have clearance from the Fire Department, the required parking facilities or even the provision for a lift, apart from other required statutory clearances. The Corporation thus refused to issue the Occupancy Certificate for the additional two floors.

6. Petitioners alleged that the existing three floors have valid occupancy while the additional two floors have no such certificate.

They allege that the initial three floors were constructed between the years 1998 and 2000, and any further construction now would be structurally unsafe and dangerous to its occupants, especially since there are cracks in every floor of the building.

7. While so, recently, petit

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top