SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36667

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANWAR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 9957/2024



Advocates:
SHAHID AZEEZ, SAMPATH V. TOMS, NOUSHAD K A

A bail application cannot be granted without sufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime; the accused may seek relief from the Sessions Court post-committal.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bail application filed by the accused in a murder case - Allegations of conspiracy without sufficient material to connect the accused to the crime - The court refrains from commenting on the merits of the case at this stage. (Paras 2, 5, 6, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - The petitioner, being the second accused, has been in custody since 14.08.2024, and the prosecution has not provided adequate evidence linking him to the crime - The court suggests that the petitioner may approach the Sessions Court for bail after committal. (Paras 5, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused in a murder case, with allegations of conspiracy and participation in the attack on the deceased, who succumbed to injuries. The prosecution claims active involvement, but the defense argues lack of evidence.

Findings of Court:
The court does not make observations on the merits of the case and suggests the petitioner file a fresh bail application before the Sessions Court.

Issues: The main issue was whether there was sufficient evidence to connect the petitioner to the crime and the appropriateness of granting bail at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without sufficient evidence linking the petitioner to the crime, the bail application could not be granted at this stage, and the petitioner should seek relief from the Sessions Court post-committal.

Result: Bail application disposed of.

O R D E R

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita .

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.819 of 2024 of Sreekaryam Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 118(2), 126(2), 61(2), 324(4), 55 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

3. The prosecution case is that on 09.08.2024 at about 08:25 PM, the petitioner along with the other accused, in furtherance of their common intention and on account of their prior animosity towards the deceased, chased the deceased who was riding the autorickshaw and attacked him with dangerous weapons, once he stopped the vehicle, after having dragged him therefrom, wind glass in the front portion of the autorickshaw was also destroyed by them. Later, deceased had succumbed to the injuries. Thus, the above crime was registered against the petitioner and other accused for the offences under Sections 103(1), 118(2), 126(2), 61(2), 324(4), 55 and 3(5) of the BNS.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the 2 nd accused and he is in custody from 14.08.2024. The Counsel submitted that there is no materials to connect the petitioner with the crime. The only allegation is that the petitioner participated in the conspiracy. But, the prosecution has not produced any materials to connect the petitioner with the crime.

6. Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application. The Public Prosecutor made available the objection filed by the Investigating OfÏcer in which about 12 circumstances are pointed out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is actively involved in the murder.

7. I do not want to make any observation about the same. Admittedly, the Final Report is filed in this case, and the case is at the committal stage. After the committal the petitioner can approach the Trial Court with bail application. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case is now reached the Sessions Court

8. If that is the case, the petitioner can file a fresh bail application before the Sessions Court concerned and if such an application is filed, the Sessions Court will consider the same in accordance with law.

With the above observations, this bail application is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top