SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
M.J.BIJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.V.A.SATHEESH SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI

ORDER

The revision petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.62/2007 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur. He stood trial for committing the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC before that court and was found guilty, convicted and sentenced under Sections 454 and 380 of . The Trial Court sentenced the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- under Section 454 , with a default clause and also for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-under Section 380 , with a default clause.

2. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the revision petitioner/accused preferred Criminal Appeal No.468/2010 before the Sessions Court, Thalassery. As per judgment dated 06.07.2015, the learned Additional Session Judge-I, Thalassery confirmed the conviction and sentence passed against the accused and dismissed the appeal.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner contended that, even if the entire evidence adduced by the prosecution is accepted as true, no conviction under Sections 454 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top