SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.Rev.Pet 566/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.K.MOHANAN
For the Respondents: SMT. SEETHA.S, SRI.THAREEQ ANWER

The court allows the Criminal Revision Petition due to the settlement between parties, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.

Headnote:This judgment concerns a Criminal Revision Petition filed against a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, resulting in three months of simple imprisonment and a fine of `3,30,000/-. The second respondent expressed no objection to setting aside the judgment. The court finds that the matter has been settled and allows the petition. Therefore, the petitioner is set free.

Table of Content
1. petitioner convicted under the negotiable instruments act. (Para 1)
2. counsel for both parties confirm settlement. (Para 2)
3. court allows compounding of the matter. (Para 3)

ORDER

The above Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the conviction and sentence imposed as per the impugned judgment. The trial court convicted and sentenced the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of `3,30,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs thirty thousand only). The appeal filed filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4

2025:KER:37055

3. Counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submitted that the matter is settled and the 2nd respondent filed an application stating that he has no objection in setting aside the impugned judgment and he is not interested to proceed with the case. If that be the case, the compounding petition can be allowed and the impugned judgment can be set aside.

Therefore, Crl.M.A. No.3 of 2025 is allowed. The impugned judgment is set aside. The petitioner is set free.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Petition is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top