SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 50827

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIDYA VIJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging Ext.P1 order issued by the Thrikkakara Municipality under Section 406(3) of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). It is the case of the petitioner that Ext.P1 order was issued without notice to her.

2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Municipality would submit that notice of the proceedings was given to the father of the petitioner, from whom the petitioner has obtained the property in terms of Ext.P2 settlement deed. It is submitted that the provisional order issued under Section 406(1) of the Act can be served on the petitioner and thereafter fresh final orders under Section 406(3) of the Act can be issued after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

3. Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Municipality, this writ petition will stand disposed of in the following manner:-

(i) Ext.P1 order issued under Section 406(3) of the Act will stand set aside, without prejudice to the right of the Municipality to pass fresh orders, after affording an opportunity of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top