SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34668

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
SANAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.K.VARGHESE, M.T.SAMEER, DHANESH V.MADHAVAN, JERRY MATHEW, REGHU SREEDHARAN, DEVIKA K.R.

ORDER

This is an application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita , seeking regular bail.

2.The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime No.1225 of 2020 of Anthikkad Police Station, which was registered against them for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 341, 324, 326, 302, 392, 506(ii), 212, 109, and 201, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act .

3.The prosecution case is that, the deceased Nidhil, who was an accused in Crime No.964/2020 of Anthikkad Police Station, was murdered by the petitioners on 10.10.2020 at about 11.15 A.M as a retaliation of the murder of one Adharsh, in respect of which, the Crime No.964/2020 was registered by the Anthikkad Police Station. As part of the investigation, the 1 st accused was arrested on 11.10.2020, 2 nd accused was arrested on 12.10.2020, 3 rd and 4 th accused were arrested on 24.10.2020 and 5 th and 6 th accused were arrested on 13.10.2020.

Since then, they have been under judicial detention. Even though the petitioners have approached this Court seeking bail on several occasions, all the said applications were rejected, taking note of the seriousness of the allegat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top