SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6298

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. Sudha, J
PRINCE – Appellant
Versus
S.LOGENDRAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

This appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree dated 26/03/2003 in O.S.No.123/2001 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kattappana. The respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. The parties and the documents will be referred to as described in the suit.

2. The suit was one for cancellation of Exts.A1 to A3 agreements executed by the plaintiffs in favour of defendants 1 to 3. According to the plaintiffs, who are siblings, the agreements were executed on 23/08/1999 when an amount of ₹2,30,000/- was borrowed from the first defendant. The documents though styled as 'agreements for sale' were meant to be only as a security for the money transaction between the parties. It was agreed that when the amount was repaid with interest, the first defendant would execute and register three release deeds in favour of the plaintiffs. While so in June 2000, the first plaintiff was informed by the first defendant that the money he had lend to the former had been taken from defendants 4 and 5 and that the money is being demanded back and therefore wanted the plaintiffs to return the amount immediately. The first plaintiff was not in posse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top