HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
JOSEKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
TOM SOJAN – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The suit for cancellation of Exts.A7 to A9 Gift Deeds was dismissed by the trial court. The second plaintiff is in appeal.
2. The first plaintiff is the mother of the second plaintiff. The first defendant is another son of the first plaintiff. The second defendant is the wife of the first defendant. The third defendant is the daughter of defendants 1 and 2.
3. The plaint consists of three items of properties as described in plaint schedule item Nos.1 to 3. Plaint schedule item No.1 is an extent of 38.60 Ares with a residential building thereon. Plaint schedule item No.2 property is 7.65 Ares and plaint schedule item No.3 property is 26.80 Ares with improvements thereon.
4. On 10.08.2004, the first plaintiff executed Ext.A7 Gift Deed with regard to plaint schedule item Nos.1 and 2 properties in favour of the first defendant, Ext.A9 Gift Deed in favour of the second plaintiff with regard to 10 cents = 4.05 Ares out of plaint schedule item No.3 property, and Ext.A8 in favour of the third defendant for the remaining extent out of the third schedule. The suit was filed seeking to set aside the gift deeds. In the suit, the first plaintiff mother was sought to be represented b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.