SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6432

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
SHIHABUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the registered owner of a goods carriage/tanker lorry bearing registration No.KL-36-D-1063. The said vehicle was seized by the Health Inspector attached to the Kozhikode Municipal Corporation on the allegation that it was used for discharging excreta at a place near a residential house. Ext.P2 is the seizure mahazar. After the seizure, a report was sent to the 2nd respondent, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, for initiating proceedings under Section 340B of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 [for brevity, ‘the Act’]. According to the petitioner, the seizure is illegal since it was only on the apprehension of intention to discharge excreta the vehicle was seized and no case is made out under Section 340A or 340B of the Act and those Sections are attracted only if deposit of rubbish, filth or excreta is made in water bodies or water sources.

2. Those are matters for the 2nd respondent to consider in the proceedings initiated under Section 340B of the Act, 1994. However, taking note of the fact that the vehicle was seized early as on 01.02.2024 and to avoid the same from being rusted and ruined, I am of the view that the vehicle can be released to the petitioner o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top