SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 53249

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
RAVEENDRAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
BHASKARAN (DIED) – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P.SREEKUMAR

Table of Content
1. plaintiffs sought declaration (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. non grant of declaration (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. suit for declaration must include (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. no substantial question of law (Para 24)

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

The defendant in O.S.No.168/2015 on the files of Munsiff Court, Erattupetta is the appellant in R.S.A.No.17 of 2024. Plaintiffs in the above Suit are the respondents herein. The appellant assails the decree and judgment in the above Suit, which were confirmed by the appellate court in A.S.No.17/2021.

2. R.S.A.No.20 of 2024 is at the instance of the plaintiffs in O.S.302/2014 on the files of Munsiff Court, Erattupetta. The respondents are the defendants in the above Suit. Verdicts in O.S.No.302/2014 on the files of Munsiff Court, Erattupetta and A.S.No.16/2021 on the files of the Sub Court, Pala, are under challenge in this appeal.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants on admission. Perused the judgments under challenge and the documents placed by the learned counsel for the appellants.

4. Originally O.S.No.302/2014 was filed by Sarasamma and another as plaintiffs arraying Nalini and others

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top