SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5795

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
AHAMMEDKUTTY BRAN, – Appellant
Versus
SUKUMARAN., – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Challenging the dismissal of a suit for return of advance sale consideration, the plaintiff is in appeal.

2. Ext.A1 agreement dated 11.11.2013 was entered into between the plaintiff and the predecessor of the defendants, Rosamma. As per Ext.A1, an extent of 25 cents with the residential building thereon was agreed to be conveyed by Rosamma to the plaintiff for a sale consideration of ` 62.50 lakhs. On the date of agreement an amount of ` 12.5 lakhs was paid towards advance sale consideration. The balance consideration was payable on or before 11.05.2014. Alleging breach of the agreement by the defendants, the suit was filed for return of the advance sale consideration.

3. The defendants admitted Ext.A1 agreement executed by the predecessor. It was contended that the agreement was entered into for raising of funds for the treatment of their mother Rosamma. Consequent on the failure of the plaintiff to pay the balance sale consideration, there occurred breach. Rosamma had entered into an agreement for sale with the third party- Rajan for purchase of his property. An amount of ` 13 lakhs was paid towards advance sale consideration. Consequent on the failure of the plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top