SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6656

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
SREEDHARAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER – Respondent


Advocates:
RAVI KRISHNAN

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“a) call for the entire records leading up to Ext.P4 and quash the same by way issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions.

b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P4 and permitted to function match splint Unit by name and style Sree Sastha Splints and Veneer till the disposal of Exhibit P4.”

2. This writ petition is filed challenging a stop memo. No interim order is passed in this case. Probably, the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. The case is listed in the defect list.

There is no representation for the petitioner also.

In the said circumstances, this writ petition need not be retained here. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE

SPR

APPENDIX PETITIONE R 'S ANNEXUR E S:-

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WPC NO.32760/2014 DATED 12/12/2014.

EXHIBIT P2 (a) ANDTRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION (b) SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD ISSUED BY THE

1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top