SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38803

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
SURENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.K.SUBHASH DANIC ANTONY

Table of Content
1. counsel argues against conviction (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. revision petition dismissed (Para 10)

ORDER :

The sole accused in C.C.No.879/2014 on the files of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasaragod, who is aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed on 06.09.2019 and its modification by the appellate court as per the judgment dated 21.11.2023 in Crl.Appeal No.197/2019 on the files of Additional Sessions Court-III, Kasaragod, has filed this Criminal Revision Petition under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (` BNSS ’ for short).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/accused and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the verdicts under challenge.

3. The prosecution case is that the accused herein committed offences punishable under Sections 406 , 465 , 468 , 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code (` IPC ’ for short) and the precise allegation is that the accused, who is none other than the husband of the second witness, obtained 50 sovereigns of gold ornaments gifted to her by her mother during marriage with promise to keep the same in a bank locker. In violation of the entrustment, he had pledged the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top