HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
JAYASREE B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) 15650/2024
Banning - Deposits - Banning Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 - Sections 7, 14, 16, 30 - The court found that the provisional attachment order had lapsed due to the failure to confirm within the stipulated time, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for attachment under the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought relief for timely consideration of their petition regarding the attachment of properties of Chirayath Benefit Fund Nidhi Ltd under the Banning Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment order lapsed due to the failure to confirm it within 60 days as required by the Banning Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the lack of confirmation of the provisional attachment order within the statutory period of 60 days rendered it void, thus necessitating fresh proceedings for property attachment.
Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of directing the issuance of a fresh provisional order for property attachment.
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2024 The petitioner, a depositor in an establishment name 'Chirayath Benefit Fund Nidhi Ltd' has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs;
2.From the statement filed by the learned Government Pleader, it has come out that, as Annexure R(a) order dated 12.04.2023, all immovable properties and other deposits held by the Chirayath Benefit Fund Nidhi Ltd and the money or other property acquired either in the name of the deposit taker, or in the name of any other person on behalf of the deposit taker, were attached provisionally.
3.Learned Government Pleader submitted that, urgent steps have been taken by the District Collectors to attach all the movable/immovable properties in terms of the provisional attachment order. Annexure R(b) dated 26.06.2023 is one such order.
4.Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that, after issuing the provisional attachment order, application for confirming the attachment was not made before the designated court, within the 60 days stipulated in the Banning Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act , 2019.
As there is no provision for extending the period of 60 days, the provisional attachment order would have lapsed.
5.Learned Government Pleader also admitted that the provisional attachment order cannot now be confirmed. To get over this issue fresh, proceedings have been initiated to issue a fresh provisional order. Once such an order is passed, confirmation of the same will be sought by the designated court within the stipulated time.
Recording the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to issue fresh provisional order with respect to the properties of Chirayath Benefit Fund Nidhi Ltd and to take timely follow up action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.