SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30045

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM


PRESENT


THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS


FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946


CRL.MC NO. 2489 OF 2024


CRIME NO.740/2022 OF Venjaramoodu Police Station,


Thiruvananthapuram


AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.979 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL


MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,NEDUMANGAD


PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4:


1


ARUN S


AGED 29 YEARS


S/O PRABHAVATHI, KANIYAM KONATHU VEEDU, KALAMACHAL P.O,


VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM, PIN – 695606.


2


VINEETH V


AGED 32 YEARS


S/O VIJAYAN K, VILAYIL VEEDU, KALAMACHAL


P.O,VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695606.


3


AKHIL J


AGED 31 YEARS


S/O JAYAKUMAR, CHERUKARA VEEDU, KALAMACHAL P.O,


VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695606.


4


REJIN P


AGED 35 YEARS


S/O PRATHAPAN S, PARAMUKALIL VEEDU, KALAMACHAL P.O,


VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695606.


BY ADVS.


FATHIMA SHALU S.


DEEPU RAJAGOPAL


RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:


1


STATE OF KERALA


REP.BY, PUBLIC PROSECOTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA


ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682031.


2


THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER


VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, NELLANADU,


THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695607


3


ARUN S.A


S/O SOMAN, S.A NIVAS, ATHIRTHIMUKKU, KALAMACHAL P.O,


VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695606.


2024:KER:29544


CRL.MC NO. 2489 OF 2024


2


4


SOBIN S.A


S/O SOMAN, S.A NIVAS, ATHIRTHIMUKKU,


KALAMACHAL P.O, VAMANAPURAM,


THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695606.


BY ADV. ALBIN VARGHESE – R3 & R4


SMT. SREEJA V. (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR


ADMISSION ON 05.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY


PASSED THE FOLLOWING:


2024:KER:29544


CRL.MC NO. 2489 OF 2024


3


BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.


-----------------------------------------


Crl.M.C. No. 2489 of 2024


----------------------------------------


Dated this the 5th day of April, 2024

ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C.C. No. 979 of 2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court- I, Nedumangad, arising out of Crime No.740 of 2022 of Venjaramoodu Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 506(i) and 323 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Respondents 3 and 4 are the defacto complainant and the injured witness.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 12-06-2022 restrained the defacto complainant and assaulted him and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure 3 and Annexure 4 affidavits filed by respondents 3 and 4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are genuine, and the defacto complainant and the other deponent stand by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 979 of 2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class CRL.MC NO. 2489 OF 2024 Magistrate's Court-I, Nedumangad are quashed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top