HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Kauser Edappagath, J
ABDUL GAFOOR K.K – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) 16179/2024
Transplantation - Kidney Transplant - Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014 - Summary of Acts and Sections Discussed
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to submit a joint application for a kidney transplant, but the 3rd respondent refused to accept it without a Police Clearance Certificate, prompting the petitioners to approach the court for relief.
Issues: Whether the 3rd respondent can refuse to accept the application for kidney transplantation due to lack of a Police Clearance Certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the necessity of a Police Clearance Certificate should be assessed by the DLAC based on the specific circumstances of the case, avoiding undue delays in urgent medical situations.
Final Decision: The writ petition is ordered to be processed without unnecessary delays under specified conditions.
The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the 3rd respondent to accept and forward Ext.P2 to the 2nd respondent.
2. The 1st petitioner is a Stage V Chronic Kidney Disease patient waiting for kidney transplantation. The 2nd petitioner who is a close family friend of the 1st petitioner has voluntarily consented to give his kidney to the 1st petitioner. According to the petitioners, they have prepared Ext.P2 joint application in Form No.11 supported by all relevant documents for submission before the 3rd respondent as prescribed in the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014. But, the 3rd respondent is refusing to accept and forward their joint application to the 2nd respondent – District Level Authorization Committee (DLAC) on the ground of non production of Police Clearance Certificate ('PCC') from the 4th respondent. It is in these circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court.
3. Heard Adv.Amalendun.S, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Adv.R.S. Kalkura, the learned standing counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent and Adv.E.G.Gorden, the learned Senior Government Pleader for the respondents.
4. The counsel submitted that the health condition of the 1st petitioner is deteriorating day by day and it became urgent to conduct Renal Transplantation at the earliest to save his life. The learned counsel for petitioners relied on the dictums laid down in Shoukath Ali Pullikuzhiyil & Another v. District Level Authorization Committee and Others [ 2017 (3) KHC 259 ] and Soubiya v. District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Ernakulam [ 2023 (6) KHC 293 ].
5. In Shoukath Ali (supra), it was held that verification through police as a routine manner in all cases should generally be avoided and if Authorization Committee doubts genuineness of claims or bona fides of persons or genuineness and bona fides of the documents produced, verification through police can be ordered. In Soubiya (supra), it was held that the question whether police clearance certificate is necessary or not should be left to DLAC.
In the light of the dictum laid down in the above decisions, this writ petition is ordered in the following manner:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.