Devan Ramachandran , J. It is conceded before us by both sides that all the issues between the parties, as impelled in this appeal, have been settled between them, under the aegis of the Ernakulam Mediation Centre, High Court of Kerala.

2. We notice from the file that a report has been submitted by Sri.E.D.George - learned Mediator, annexing therewith a Memorandum of Settlement between the parties.

3. Today, both sides are ad idem that the appellant has already executed a Settlement Deed in favour of his children, as required under clause No.1 of the Memorandum of Settlement; but that the extent of the land has been found to be only 40 cents and not 42 cents, as mentioned therein.

4. Sri.M.S.Amal Darshan – learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that since the parties deliberately did not fix a time frame for making payment as per clause 8 of the agreement, no fault can be cast on his clients because, they are finding it very difficult to sell the property. He, however, added MA (EXE.) NO. 2 OF 2022 that they will make payment by 15.11.2024.

5. Sri.K.B.Pradeep – learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that his client is suffering from a debilitating disease and adm