Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, J
PRIMAL THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the labor dispute and settlement process. (Para 4) |
| 2. respondents counter the petitioner's claims regarding settlement awareness. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against the enforceability of the settlement. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's review of the petitioner's acknowledgment of the settlement. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court finds misconduct by the petitioner and imposes penalties. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT Amit Rawal, J.
The appellant-petitioner had filed the writ petition before this court with the following prayers:
(i). Call for the records leading to. Exhibits P5, P5(a) and P6 notices and quash the same by issuing a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ, order or direction.
(ii) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose Exhibit P7 representation within a time limit as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
(iii) To declare that Exhibit P8 proceedings is not binding upon the petitioner as the same is not a memorandum of settlement award as contemplated under Rule 59 and Form H of the Industrial Dispute Rules (Kerala), 1957.
(iv) Dispense with the production of English translation of documents wh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
