JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed to direct the 1^st respondent bank to lift the freezing of the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.99980109114970.

2. The petitioner’s case is that, he is the holder of the above bank account with the 1^st respondent bank. The said account has been debit freezed by the 1^st respondent pursuant to the requisition received from the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents. The action of the 1^st respondent is arbitrary.

Hence, the writ petition.

3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1^st respondent.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, despite the directions in Ext.P3 judgment dated 27.03.2024, the 1^st respondent has not removed the lien on the petitioner’s bank account. Hence, the writ petition may be allowed.

5. When the writ petition came up for consideration on 14.03.2025, this Court directed the 1^st respondent bank to forthwith lift the debit freezing and also remove the lien, if any, marked on the petitioner’s bank account.

In the light of the above interim order, I am of the view that nothing survives in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of by making the interim o