JUDGMENT

1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Interim Order, if any, stands vacated.

Sd/-

DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Svn APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14641/2020 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE GST REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE NUMBERED 32AAACE5011CIZM.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD JULY 2017.

EXHIBIT P2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 2017.

EXHIBIT P2(B) TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 2017.

EXHIBIT P2(C) TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 2017.

EXHIBIT P2(D) TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 2017.

EXHIBIT P2(E) TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM GST RFD-01 FOR THE PERIOD DECEMBER 2017.

EXHIBIT P2