Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 5TH ASWINA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27499 OF 2024 PETITIONER:
CHACKO MATHEW, AGED 57 YEARS S/O.MATHEW MATHEW, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, PONTHANPUZHA P.O., MANIMALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686544 BY ADVS.
LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM ATHUL V. VADAKKEDOM RESPONDENTS:
1 THE MANIMALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE MANIMALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KARIKKATTOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686544
2 THE SECRETARY, MANIMALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, OFFICE OF THE MANIMALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KARIKKATTOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686544 OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.P.ADHIL, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J ==========================
W.P(C) No. 27499 of 2024 ==========================
Dated this the 27th day of September, 2024
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;
“ i. Call for the records leading to the passing of Exhibit P10 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order.
ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to process the application for renewal of licence, submitted by the petitioner, referred to in Exhibit P10 and to grant the same.
iii. To dispense with the filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced with the Writ Petition (Civil).
iv. grant such other reliefs which this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Today when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel on both sides submit that the licence of the petitioner has been renewed. This is recorded. Nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE LU APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27499/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS :
EXHIBIT P1 THE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 871/2017 DATED
31/12/2016 OF THE SRO, MANIMALA EXHIBIT P2 THE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. A3- 3417/21 DATED
26/8/2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 A COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED
7.9.2021 EXHIBIT P4 A COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ORDER NO. SC1-
3417/23 DATED 22.6.2023 EXHIBIT P5 A COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 10.7.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P6 A COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 5.7.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P7 THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.7.2023 IN W.P.(C). NO. 24465/2023 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA EXHIBIT P8 A COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER NO. NO.S.C1-3417/23 DATED 7.11.2023 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P9 A COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2023 IN I.A.
1608/2023 IN APPEAL NO. 577/2023 BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXHIBIT P10 A COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. SC2.1690/24 DATED 14.5.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT // True Copy // PA To Judge
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
