HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
SUDEVAN @ KUNJUMON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.Rev.Pet 434/2023
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , challenging judgment in Crl.Appeal No.186/2012 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-V, Kollam, arising out of judgment in C.C.No.507/2008, dated 4.7.2012.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petition and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail.
3. In this matter, the revision petitioner was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC ’ hereinafter) and accordingly, he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default sentence of 15 days’ simple imprisonment under Section 323 of the . He was also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- with default sentence of 15 days’ simple imprisonment under Section 341 of the . The revision petitioner was also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- with default sentence of
3 months’ simple imprisonment under Section 427 of the IPC .
4. Although appeal filed, challenging the said verdict, the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence.
5. Today, when this matter came up for admission, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that, in connection with execution of the sentence, the revision petitioner was arrested on 8.11.2024 and has been in custody. The learned counsel also would submit that, in view of the custody of the revision petitioner, the revision petitioner is satisfied with modification of sentence, confining the same to the period of custody undergone and also to pay Rs.5,000/- ordered under Section 427 of the IPC , with default imprisonment.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor also did not oppose the prayer.
7. On perusal of the verdicts under challenge, I am of the view that sentence is to be modified in the interest of justice, taking note of the custody of the revision petitioner on 8.11.2024. Accordingly, the sentence stands modified as under:
The sentence imposed on the revision petitioner for the offence under Section 341 of the IPC is modified with direction to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days and the sentence imposed for the offence under Section 323 of the for a period of three months also is reduced to a period of 15 days. Further, the revision petitioner is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 427 of the or to undergo default imprisonment for a period of one month. The substantive sentence of imprisonment for the offences under and 323 of the , shall run concurrently. The default sentence imposed for the offence under of the shall run separately after undergoing the sentence imposed for the offences under Sections 341 and 323 of the .
If the revision peititoner has alredy undergone the sentence, the Jail Superintendent concerned is directed to release the revision petitioner on payment of fine for the offence under Section 427 of the IPC , if the revision petitioner’s custody is not necessary in connection with any other crime. If payment of fine is not effected, default imprisonment also shall be undergone by the revision petitioner, on completion of 15 days of imprisonment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.