SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41234

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MAYA PRIYADARSINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C No.385/2018 on the files of the Special Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, for the Trial of Cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Thiruvananthapuram. Petitioner challenges the order dated 26.09.2024 in CMP No.5243/2024, dismissing his application for sending the cheque to a handwriting expert to compare the writings on the cheque.

2. The complaint was filed alleging an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, contending that the cheque for Rs.12,00,000/- issued on 24.03.2017 when presented for encashment returned dishonoured with the memo “Funds insufÏcient”. It is also alleged that, though notice was served on the accused he failed to reply or repay the amount. After the complaint was filed, the accused preferred an application requesting to compare the writings on the cheque with that of the writings of the accused by sending the cheque to a handwriting expert. The learned Magistrate dismissed the said application against which this Crl.M.C is filed.

3. I have heard Sri. R.V. Sreejith, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri. C.N. Prabhaka

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top