Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
AKHIL MOHANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and allegations against the accused. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the quashment request. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court observations on the applicability of pocso and prior case law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of the application. (Para 11) |
ORDER
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking the relief to quash Annexure-1 FIR, final report thereof and further proceedings in S.C.No.3/712023 on the files of Fast Track Special Court, Perumbavoor, against the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the relevant records.
3. Here the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Section s 450 , 376(2)(n), 354, 354A(1)(i), 354D(1)(i), 354D(1)(ii) of the Indian Penal Code (` IPC ’ for short), Section 4 r/w 3, 6(1) r/w 5(l), 8 r/w 7, 10 r/w 9(l), 12 r/w 11(iv), 15 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (`POCSO Act’ for short) and Section 66E of Information Technology Act (`IT Act’ for short).
4. The prosecution ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
