HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
NIZAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defense claims management bias (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 2. evidence corroboration (Para 9) |
| 3. insufficient evidence for intent (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
The revision petitioner was the accused in C.C No.22 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kayamkulam. He was convicted for the offences under Sections 323 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code (‘ IPC ’, in short) and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 323 of and to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 354 of and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each.
2. The appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as per the judgment dated 8.11 2013 in Crl A No.326 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Court-I, Mavelikkara.
3. Before the Trial Court, from the side of prosecution PWs 1 to 6 were examined and Exts P1 to P5 documents were marked. On closing the evidence of the prosecution, the petitioner was examined under Section 313(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He denied all the incriminating circumstan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.