Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MRS. FAREEDA SUKHA RAFIQ – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the entitlements to interest accrued on ppf accounts and their operational complexity. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented discussing statutory interpretations affecting account limits. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. the court's observations on account opening procedures and interpretations of the rules. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. an analysis of the relevant rules providing clarity on individual account management. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling on the prohibition of combining accounts for limit application. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
The 3rd petitioner is the mother of the 1st and 2nd petitioners. The dispute in this writ petition is with regard to the interest accrued in three separate PPF accounts opened with the 2nd respondent herein by the petitioners.
2. The short facts necessary for the disposal of this writ petition are as under:
The 3rd petitioner started a PPF account No.821 with the 2nd respondent Post Office. Since the 1st and 2nd petitioners were minors during the period when account No.821 was started, and since the 3rd petitioner also wanted to have separate savings accounts in the name of her children, she opened separate PPF accounts with the 2nd respondent Post Offic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
