SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2204

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
SANTHOSH P.N – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

The issues raised in both the writ petitions pertain to the parking of autorickshaws and auto taxis at the Gunduparambu Stand in Chellanam Grama Panchayat.

The counsel on both sides refer to various orders issued by the Panchayat as well as by the Regional Transport Officer regarding the parking of autorickshaws.

2. On going through the pleadings and hearing counsel on both sides, I am of the view that the entire issues in these writ petitions can be resolved if the Traffic Regulatory Committee constituted for the Chellanam Grama Panchayat is directed to address the issues regarding the parking of autorickshaws and auto taxis in the Gunduparambu area of Chellanam Grama Panchayat.

The Traffic Regulatory Committee constituted for the Chellanam Grama Panchayat, represented by its Chairman, President, Chellanam Grama Panchayat, Chellanam P.O, 682008 is suo motu impleaded as additional respondent in both writ petitions.

3. The Division Bench of this Court in Noushad M. v. State of Kerala ( 2019 (2) KHC 562 ) has directed constitution of Traffic Regulatory Committee in every Local Self Government Institutions in terms of Section 72 of the Kerala Police Act . of the provides for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top