SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12370

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
MUHAMMED RASIC S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[WP(C) Nos.35538/2023, 243/2024, 259/2024, 288/2024, 322/2024, 966/2024, 35700/2023, 35941/2023, 36265/2023, 36427/2023, 36499/2023, 36999/2023, 38038/2023, 38884/2023, 40193/2023, 41302/2023, 41715/2023, 41847/2023, 42214/2023, 42846/2023, 42854/2023, 43163/2023, 43452/2023, 44050/2023]

Prefatorily, these writ petitions are virtually a sequel - claiming the same reliefs - to a set of ones that were filed earlier by certain others, which culminated in the judgment of this Court in WP(C)No.17739/2021 and connected matters. It must also be recorded that this judgment was confirmed by a learned Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1965/2022 and connected matters; and that the Special Leave Petitions attempted by the State before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against them, stand dismissed.

2. The afore facts are not in dispute and is expressly conceded by the learned counsel on both sides.

3. Compendiously, the petitioners in these cases – which have been heard together, adverting to the analogous facts and circumstances presented and the identical tenor of the reliefs sought for – are all Authorised Retail Distributors (ARD), within the ambit of the Kerala Rationing Order, 1966, n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top