HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
MUHAMMED RASIC S – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.35538/2023, 243/2024, 259/2024, 288/2024, 322/2024, 966/2024, 35700/2023, 35941/2023, 36265/2023, 36427/2023, 36499/2023, 36999/2023, 38038/2023, 38884/2023, 40193/2023, 41302/2023, 41715/2023, 41847/2023, 42214/2023, 42846/2023, 42854/2023, 43163/2023, 43452/2023, 44050/2023]
Prefatorily, these writ petitions are virtually a sequel - claiming the same reliefs - to a set of ones that were filed earlier by certain others, which culminated in the judgment of this Court in WP(C)No.17739/2021 and connected matters. It must also be recorded that this judgment was confirmed by a learned Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1965/2022 and connected matters; and that the Special Leave Petitions attempted by the State before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against them, stand dismissed.
2. The afore facts are not in dispute and is expressly conceded by the learned counsel on both sides.
3. Compendiously, the petitioners in these cases – which have been heard together, adverting to the analogous facts and circumstances presented and the identical tenor of the reliefs sought for – are all Authorised Retail Distributors (ARD), within the ambit of the Kerala Rationing Order, 1966, n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.