HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SOPHY THOMAS, J
P.YAHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
This revision is at the instance of the accused in CC No.163 of 2003 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III (Mobile Court), Ernakulam, assailing the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.526 of 2007 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc-II), Ernakulam, which upheld his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred as ‘the N.I Act’). 2. CC No.163 of 2003 arose out of a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent/complainant against the revision petitioner under of the N.I Act. The allegation in the complaint was that, the complainant/2nd respondent, a partnership firm engaged in the wholesale business of readymade garments at Ernakulam, supplied readymade items to the revision petitioner who was running a shop by name M/s.Arafa Tex at Kollam. Towards the cost of readymade garments purchased by the revision petitioner from the complainant/2nd respondent, he issued cheque No.13859 dated 10.10.1998 drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Umainalloor branch for an amount of Rs.42,639/-. When the complainant presented that cheque for encashment, it was returned unpaid for the reason ‘exceeds arrangement’. The complainant/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.