SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 51885

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SOPHY THOMAS, J
P.YAHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH, SRI.K.M.SANAL, ANUP T PAUL

O R D E R

This revision is at the instance of the accused in CC No.163 of 2003 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III (Mobile Court), Ernakulam, assailing the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.526 of 2007 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc-II), Ernakulam, which upheld his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred as ‘the N.I Act’). 2. CC No.163 of 2003 arose out of a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent/complainant against the revision petitioner under of the N.I Act. The allegation in the complaint was that, the complainant/2nd respondent, a partnership firm engaged in the wholesale business of readymade garments at Ernakulam, supplied readymade items to the revision petitioner who was running a shop by name M/s.Arafa Tex at Kollam. Towards the cost of readymade garments purchased by the revision petitioner from the complainant/2nd respondent, he issued cheque No.13859 dated 10.10.1998 drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Umainalloor branch for an amount of Rs.42,639/-. When the complainant presented that cheque for encashment, it was returned unpaid for the reason ‘exceeds arrangement’. The complainant/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top