HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
AADHIL VALIYAKOVILAKAM RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) 1040/2024
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 10th day of January, 2024 The petitioner is holder of an Indian Passport bearing No.S2913314, which he obtained in the year 2018 and is valid up to 30.05.2028. The petitioner is a Post Graduate in Business Administration and has got job opportunity in United Arab Emirates now. As per the present requirement, the petitioner has to submit a Police Clearance Certificate for joining duty.
2. Section 59 of the Kerala Police Act , 2011 provides for the issuance of Police Clearance Certificate. But, these certificates are confined to jobs in Kerala only. As far as overseas employment, it is for the Passport Authority concerned to issue Police Clearance Certificate, as clarified by Ext.P5 Circular issued by the Kerala Police Chief and Ext.P6 judgment of this Court. Therefore, the petitioner applied for Police Clearance Certificate by submitting an online application to the 1st respondent.
3. On 14.12.2023, the petitioner received Ext.P9 notice alleging that he obtained Passport by suppressing pendency of a criminal case and calling upon him to show cause against the initiation of action to impound his Passport under Sections 10(3)(b) and 12(1)(b) of the Passport Act , 1967. The notice also directed to surrender Ext.P3 Passport to the 1st respondent. Since the crime referred was registered only after five years, he was issued with the Passport. So, the allegation that the petitioner suppressed the pendency of the crime is absolutely incorrect.
4. Since permission of the Magistrate Court is required for going abroad, the petitioner obtained permission as per Ext.P10 which also directed the Police to issue Police Clearance Certificate. But, in the light of Ext.P5 Circular and Ext.P6 judgment, it is for the 1st respondent to issue Police Clearance Certificate. The 1st respondent refuses to act upon Ext.P8 application and issue Police Clearance Certificate to the petitioner, contends the Counsel for the petitioner.
5. The Deputy Solicitor General entered appearance and resisted the writ petition. When pendency of a crime was noted, the petitioner was issued with Ext.P9 show cause notice. Though the petitioner submits that the crime registered against the petitioner was subsequent to the issuance of the Passport to him, no materials are projected or made available in Ext.P11 reply. If the petitioner shows that the crime was registered subsequent to the issuance of the Passport, then his application for Police Clearance Certificate can be considered and possibility of issuing a customised Police Clearance Certificate can be considered.
6. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Solicitor General representing the 1st respondent. I have also heard the learned Government Pleader representing the 2nd respondent.
7. The petitioner would assert that the crime was registered against him subsequent to the issuance of Passport. But, the reply given to Ext.P9, by way of Ext.P11 does not disclose the dates of registration of crime or any particulars of the crime.
8. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to file an additional reply to Ext.P9. If the petitioner gives a proper reply to Ext.P9, giving all particulars relating to registration of FIR / crime, then the Regional Passport Officer can very well consider the matter and process the application for issuance of Police Clearance Certificate.
The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the petitioner to file an additional reply to Ext.P9 within a period of one week disclosing the particulars of FIR / crime registered against the petitioner. The petitioner shall also produce a certified / attested copy of Ext.P10 judgment. If a reply is given producing necessary materials, then the Regional Passport Officer shall process the application for issuance of customised Police Clearance Certificate to the petitioner and take a final decision thereon within a period of two weeks from the da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.