SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39047

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SOPHY THOMAS, J
PAULSON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SRI.P.M.RAFIQ

Table of Content
1. accused charged under ipc (Para 3 , 4)
2. trial court's findings (Para 5 , 6)
3. defense claims innocence (Para 7)
4. evidence of witnesses (Para 8)
5. modified sentencing (Para 10 , 11)
6. directives for trial court (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

This appeal is at the instance of the sole accused in S.C No. 397/2006 on the file of IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court No.1, Thrissur, challenging his conviction and sentence under section 304(A) and 429 of IPC , as per judgment dated 03.08.2007.

2. The prosecution allegation is that on 03.05.2001, at 4 a.m., the accused drove Reg.No.KL.8F.1555, stage carriage through Thirssur-Kunnamkulam Public road, in a rash and negligent manner endangering human life, from south towards north and near the chapel Mundoor it hit against the back side of an elephant which as walking in front, causing serious injuries and thereafter the bus rammed into a tree standing by the road side. CWs 2 to 10, who were passengers in the bus and CWs 11 and 12 -the mahouts of the elephant got injured. A five year old boy named Sinil, who was also the traveling in that bus, sustained serious injuries to which he succumbed. The accused drove the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top