HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
ARUN JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. student requests curriculum change for job prospects. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments versus government's curriculum authority. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes professional control over curriculum. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be a student of the Government I.T.I., Chalakkudy; and his singular plea is that the curriculum of the course be ordered to be re-designed by the respondents, thus rendering only five days of the week to be working, with Saturdays and Sundays being holidays.
2. Sri.Sherry J.Thomas – learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of the afore plea of his client, pointed out that the syllabus of the I.T.I. has been now revisited under the National Skill Qualification Frame Work Scheme, and that the hours of training have been reduced to 1200 hours from the earlier 1600 hours. He submitted that, therefore, his client preferred Ext.P1 representation before the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Kerala, specifying the manner in which the working hours can be modulated, thus allowing two days of week to be holidays; but that this has been rejected by the Government through Ext.P2 order, merely saying that if his request is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.