SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34862

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
NIMIJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.MC 9443/2022



Advocates:
THAREEQ ANVER, K.K.SALMA, JENNATH K.SHAMSUDHEEN, K.C.KHAMARUNNISA, RASSAL JANARDHANAN, A.ARUN CHAND, SHAHNOY, SHAJI GOVIND G. NAIR

The wife of a brother is considered a 'relative' under Section 498A of the IPC, and allegations of body shaming do not constitute cruelty as defined by law.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 498A – Quashing of proceedings – The petitioner, as the wife of the elder brother of the first accused, is considered a relative under Section 498A – Allegations of body shaming do not constitute cruelty as defined under Section 498A – The court held that mere comments do not meet the threshold for cruelty – Petition dismissed. (Paras 1, 10, 12, 14)

(B) Definition of 'Relative' – The term 'relative' includes individuals related by blood, marriage, or adoption – The court clarified that the wife of a brother falls within the definition of relative for the purposes of Section 498A. (Paras 4, 10)

(C) Cruelty under Section 498A – The court reiterated that cruelty must involve conduct likely to drive a woman to suicide or cause grave injury – Body shaming and doubts about qualifications do not meet this threshold. (Paras 12, 14)

Facts of the case: The petitioner, the wife of the elder brother of the first accused, challenged the proceedings under Section 498A alleging that she does not fall under the definition of 'relative' and that the allegations do not constitute cruelty.

Findings of Court: The court found that the petitioner is indeed a relative under Section 498A and that the allegations of body shaming do not amount to cruelty as defined in the IPC.

Issues: Whether the petitioner qualifies as a 'relative' under Section 498A and whether the allegations constitute cruelty.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the definition of 'relative' is broad enough to include the wife of a brother and that the allegations do not meet the legal definition of cruelty.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER

Dated this the 15th day of November, 2024 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) to quash Annexure 1 Final Report in C.C.No.618/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kuthuparamba, arose out of Crime No.218/2022 of the Kuthuparamba police station, Kannur, and all further proceedings thereof. The petitioner herein is the 3rd accused in the above case.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the de facto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. In a nutshell, the prosecution alleges commission of offence punishable under Section 498A r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the IPC ' hereinafter) by the accused and the foundation for the said offence stems from the plank of marriage of the 1st accused and the de facto complainant on 8.4.2019. The specific allegation is that after the marriage, while the de facto complainant was staying at the matrimonial home, she was subjected to persecution by the 1st accused, who is her husband, the 2nd accused, father-in- law of the de facto complainant and the 3rd accused, who is the wife of the elder brother of the 1st accused.

4. While seeking quashment of the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out two legal aspects. The first point argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, since the 3rd accused/the petitioner herein is the wife of the elder brother of the 1st accused, she would not come under the purview of the term 'relative' dealt under Section 498A of the IPC . According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, even though the term 'relative' is not defined in the or under of the , explanation to Section 176 of the Cr.P.C., the expression 'relative' means parents, children, brothers, sisters and spouse and nobody else. The learned counsel further argued that, in the pari materia provision viz., Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, 'the BNSS' hereinafter)

also, the same definition is engrafted. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, as per Section 2(39) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sasnhita, 2023 (for short, 'the BNS hereinafter), it has been provided that, words and expressions used but not defined in Sanhita, but defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the BNSS, 2023 shall have the meanings respectively assgined to them in that Act and Sanhita. Therefore, explanation appended to Section 176 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 196 of the BNSS to be read to understand the word 'relative' mentioned in Section 498A of the IPC . The learned counsel placed decision of the Apex Court inU.Suvetha v.State & Ors. reported in [(2009) 6 SCC 757], where the Apex Court considered the expression relative of a husband of the woman occurring in of the , while dealing with the case of a concubine. After elaborately considering the other earlier decisions, the Apex Court held that the status of relative must be conferred either by blood or marriage or adoption and if no marriage has taken place, the question of one being relative of another would not arise. In the said decision, the Apex Court dealt with the term 'relative' in paragraph No.12 as under: 12. In the absence of any statutory definition, the term `relative' must be assigned a meaning as is commonly understood. Ordinarily it would include father, mother, husband or wife, son, daughter, brother, sister, nephew or niece, grandson or grand- daughter of an individual or the spouse of any person. The meaning of the word `relative' would depend upon the nature of the statute. It principally includes a person related by blood, marriage or adoption.

The word `relative' has been defined in P. Ramanatha Aiyar Advanced Law Lexicon - Volume 4, 3rd Edition as under :-

"Relative, "RELATIVE" includes any person related by blood, marriage or adoption.

[Lunacy Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top