SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32717

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J
Prasannakumari P.S – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARAM HOME FINANCE LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 34398/2024



Advocates:
G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H, K.S.SMITHA, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, B.R.SINDU, V.ROHITH, AFNA V.P.

The court established that structured repayment plans can be ordered to facilitate loan recovery while balancing the interests of borrowers and financial institutions.

Headnote:(A) SARFAESI Act - Section 13(4) - Writ petition seeking reliefs for payment of defaulted arrears in installments - Petitioners defaulted on housing loans amounting to Rs.62,38,000/- - Court directed payment of Rs.2,00,000/- along with one regular installment and remaining overdue amount in five equal monthly installments - Failure to comply allows financial institution to proceed against petitioners. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Loan Agreements - Default in repayment - Financial institution classified loans as NPA and initiated proceedings under SARFAESI Act - Court facilitated a structured repayment plan to regularize loan accounts. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners obtained two housing loans totaling Rs.62,38,000/- and defaulted on repayments, leading to action under the SARFAESI Act. The overdue amount was Rs.8,40,336/-.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered a structured repayment plan to regularize the loan accounts, contingent on timely payments.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners could be allowed to repay defaulted arrears in installments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for a structured repayment plan to balance the interests of both parties while ensuring compliance with loan agreements.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for repayment.

Table of Content
1. petitioners obtained housing loans (Para 2)
2. petitioners defaulted on loan repayments (Para 3)
3. counsel submits overdue amount (Para 4)
4. court considers counsel's submission (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 01st day of October, 2024)

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order commanding the respondent company to permit the petitioners to pay off the defaulted arrears due as evidenced by Exhibit.P4 possession notice in fifteen monthly installments along with the regular installments.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order restraining the respondent from proceeding in furtherance to the issuance of Exhibit.P4 possession notice issued u/s 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act so as to the enable the petitioners to pay off the defaulted arrears in installments along with the regular installments.

And iii. To pass such other orders or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.”

2. The petitioners had obtained two housing loans from the respondent financial institution for an amount of Rs.39,39,000/ and 22,99,000/- respectively. The petitioners had mortgaged their property having an extent of 10.12 Ares comprised in Survey No.66/1/14 situated in Puzhakkatiri Village, Perinthalmanna Taluk in Malappuram District.

3. The petitioners have committed serious default in repaying the loan amount as per the terms of the loan agreement, and therefore, the financial institution, after classifying the petitioners loan account as NPA, has proceeded against the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and Rules made thereunder.

4. The learned counsel for the financial institution on instructions submits that as of today the total overdue amount is Rs.8,40,336/- and the total outstanding is Rs.66,36,327/-. She further submits that if the petitioners make substantial upfront payment and the remaining overdue amount in few instalments as this Court may fix along with the regular instalments, the respondent financial institution shall regularize the loan accounts of the petitioners for making payment in terms of the loan agreement in as much as the loans advanced by the financial institution are repaid up to 2039.

5. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the respondent financial institution, the present Writ Petition is disposed of on the following terms:

i) The petitioners are directed to pay Rs.2,00,000/- along with one regular instalment on or before 15.10.2024 and the remaining overdue amount in five equal monthly instalments.

ii). The first instalment is to be paid on or before 15.11.2024, and the remaining four instalments on or before the 15th day of each succeeding month.

iii) In case of failure to make payment of Rs.2,00,000/- along with the one regular instalment or any subsequent instalments as directed above, the respondent financial institution shall be free to proceed against the petitioner further to realize its outstanding dues.

iv) If the petitioners make payments as directed above, the respondent financial institution shall regularize the loan accounts of the petitioners for making further payments in terms of the loan agreement.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top