SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34152

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
D. K. SINGH, J
SHIVAKUMAR D – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER – Respondent
WP(C) 30703/2024



Advocates:
N.S.REHNA

Compliance with payment terms under the SARFAESI Act is essential to avoid further proceedings against a borrower classified as a defaulter.

Headnote:(A) SARFAESI Act – The petitioner obtained two loans from the respondent Bank, which were classified as NPA due to non-payment of EMIs. The court directed the petitioner to pay a substantial upfront amount and regular installments to avoid further action under the SARFAESI Act. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Loan Default – The court considered the petitioner's financial crisis and the Bank's willingness to regularize the loan account upon compliance with payment terms. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case: The petitioner defaulted on two loans due to financial difficulties, leading the Bank to classify the accounts as NPA. The total overdue amount was Rs.2,17,667/-.

Findings of Court: The court disposed of the writ petition with specific payment terms to avoid further action by the Bank.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner could avoid further proceedings under the SARFAESI Act by complying with payment terms.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of compliance with payment terms to regularize the loan account and avoid further action.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with payment directions.

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 21st day of October, 2024)

The petitioner has obtained two loans from the respondent Bank, housing loan for Rs.15,71,030/- and the Suraksha loan for Rs.9000/-.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not a willful defaulter and as the petitioner was in severe financial crisis, he did not pay equal monthly instalments on time. Therefore, the respondent Bank after classifying the loan accounts of the petitioner as NPA, proceeded under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and Rules made thereunder.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent Bank on instructions submits that as of today, in respect of both the loans total overdue amount is Rs.2,17,667/- and the total outstanding amount is Rs.7,49,267/-. She further submits that if the petitioner makes substantial upfront payment along with one regular E.M.I in respect of both the loans, and the remaining overdue amount in few instalments as this Court may fix along with the regular instalments, the Bank shall not proceed further under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and Rules made thereunder.

4. Considering the aforesaid stand of the Bank, the present writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:

i) The petitioner shall pay Rs.1,00,000/- along with one regular E.M.I in respect of both the loans on or before 07.11.2024 and the remaining overdue amount in eight equal monthly instalments along with the regular instalments.

ii) The 1st instalment is to be paid on or before 07.12.2024 and the remaining seven instalments on or before 7th day of each succeeding month.

iii) In case of failure to make payment of Rs.1,00,000/- along with one regular E.M.I in respect of both the loans or any other instalments as directed above, the Bank shall be free to proceed further against the petitioner to realize its outstanding dues.

iv) If the petitioner makes payments as directed above, the Bank shall regularize the loan account of the petitioner for making further payments in terms of the loan agreement.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top