Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Kauser Edappagath, J
SUMESH T.R, SHEEBA MARY, ALEXANDER T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation of fraud under buds act. (Para 1) |
| 2. government's action regarding the representation. (Para 2) |
| 3. direction for timely processing of claims. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners preferred Ext.P4 representation before the 1st respondent alleging that one Mr. Mohammed Ali P. E. (CEO of Digitrade Expert) and Mr. Sajeev (Promoter of Digitrade Expert) have extracted several lakhs of rupees from them and similarly situated persons by making them believe that they shall be provided every day profit of 1% to 5% and cheated them without giving the benefit and payment on maturity as promised. The request made in Ext.P4 representation is to attach the properties of deposit takers invoking Section 7 (3) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, 2019 (for short ‘the Act’). The limited prayer in this Writ Petition is to give a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass representation.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
3. The learned Government Pleader submits that Ext.P4 representation has been forwarded to the State Police who is conducting the enquiry on the same and the report is aw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
