HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.M. MANOJ, J
ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15045 OF 2016
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking judicial relief based on statutory compliance. (Para 1) |
| 2. relief sought was found to be infructuous. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3 rd day of December, 2024 The writ petition is preferred seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading up to Ext.P12 order and quash the same by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 6th respondent to correct the present position of the land as per the Act 28 of 2008 with regard to the property situated in Survey No.208/1 of Neduva Village in Ext.P7 draft data bank prepared by them.
iii) Pass any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time.”
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.M.MANOJ JUDGE das APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15045/2016 PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESION CERTIFICATE NO.10924230 ISSUED BY THE NEDUVA VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 20.3.2015.
P1(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESION CERTIFICATE NO.10916373 ISSUED BY NEDUVA VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 20.3.2015.
P1(B) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.10913310 ISSUED BY NEDUVA VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 20.3.2015 P2 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.5.1993 P3 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.
P4 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE
3RD RESPONDENT DATED 11.6.2002 P5 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.6.2003 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P6 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 14.12.1987 P7 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE DRAFT DATA BANK PREPARED AS PER Act 28 of 2008 P8 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16.7.2012 P9 ; THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDNET DATED 14.12.2015 P10 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
5.1.2016 IN WPC.NO. 204/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
P11 : TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES DATED 23.2.2016 OF THE 5TH RESONDENT P12 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED
3.3.2016 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.