HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.M. MANOJ, J
ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking judicial relief based on statutory compliance. (Para 1) |
| 2. relief sought was found to be infructuous. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3 rd day of December, 2024 The writ petition is preferred seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading up to Ext.P12 order and quash the same by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 6th respondent to correct the present position of the land as per the Act 28 of 2008 with regard to the property situated in Survey No.208/1 of Neduva Village in Ext.P7 draft data bank prepared by them.
iii) Pass any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time.”
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.M.MANOJ JUDGE das APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15045/2016 PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.