SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 27060

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T. R. Ravi, J
ANU D RAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The prayer in the writ petition is for effecting a change in the petitioner's mother's name in the Secondary School Examination mark sheet issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). The counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner submits a fresh application to the additional 6th respondent, the request can be considered.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the CBSE.

3. The question relating to correction of the records of the CBSE was considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav v. Central Board of Secondary Education reported in 2021 (3) KLT 711(SC). The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the CBSE cannot Act as a Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court set out a scheme in the judgment and held that all existing and future cases are to be considered on the basis of the scheme, till the CBSE amended the Byelaws and notified the same in tune with the directions on the judgment. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that once the Court decides on the issue, the CBSE need not make any further enquiry and no further verification is also required. In paragraph 152 of the judgment, the Hon'ble Supr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top