JUDGMENT

The case has been taken in the revised call. However, there is no appearance in the first call and revised call on behalf of the petitioners, though the counsel for the respondent Bank is present. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Interim Order, if any, stands vacated.

Sd/-

DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Mms APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7766/2023 PETITIONERs EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF A DIARY PROCEEDINGS IN SA NO 33 OF 2020 ON THE FILES OF DRT-1 DATED 29.01.2020 ERNAKULAM AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEB SITE EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF A DIARY PROCEEDINGS DATED 22-2-2020 IN SA NO 33 OF 2020 ON THE FILES OF DRT-1 ERNAKULAM AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEB SITE EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF A DIARY PROCEEDINGS DATED 2-3-2020 IN SA NO 33 OF 2020 ON THE FILES OF DRT-1 ERNAKULAM AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEB SITE EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF A DIARY PROCEEDINGS DATED 4-3-2020 IN SA NO 33 OF 2020 ON THE FILES OF DRT-1 ERNAKULAM AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEB SITE EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 23-2-

2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 18-1-2022 EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19TH MARCH,2022 SUBMIT